Subject: That's a good point
Author:
Posted on: 2019-10-09 01:04:00 UTC

though I did say post them, not read them

More seriously, I understand the "ow, my old work sucks" thing (which is why I'm not likely to re-read my computational epidemiology paper from 2014. I don't want to be shocked at how that got accepted to a conference, even though it's probably not actually that bad).

And this is definitely more of a problem in the case of people with lots of work that's been improving over time, like you and Ix.

All that being said ... I'm still thinking this might be worth it, even though it's going to involve a lot of looking back at old stuff.

- Tomash

Reply Return to messages